Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-11-10 allowed

Lipi Boilers Ltd vs The Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad

Bench: 2 — J.B. Pardiwala, Sandeep Mehta

In Brief

Lipi Boilers manufactured boilers and supplied certain duty-paid components directly to the buyer's project site. The tax authority sought to include these components' value in the assessable base for excise duty, arguing they were essential parts. The Supreme Court held that the boiler, once assembled and permanently embedded at the site through civil engineering work, becomes an immovable property falling outside excise duty's scope. Excise duty applies only to manufacture of movable goods. The Court also found the extended limitation period invalid, as no wilful suppression was proven. The assessee had filed returns disclosing all data. The judgment reaffirms that levy (Section 3) must precede valuation (Section 4), and immovable structures cannot bear excise duty.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Central Excise Valuation Manufacture vs Assembly Immovable Property Limitation Period Wilful Suppression

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login