Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-16 remanded

Loveleen Kumar Etc vs State of Haryana & Ors

Bench: 2 — Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

In Brief

The Supreme Court examined multiple appeals concerning compensation for 229 acres of land acquired in Hansi, Haryana in 2005. The Reference Court awarded Rs. 48,40,000 per acre; the High Court enhanced this to Rs. 2,01,97,320 per acre, relying primarily on a decade-old judgment (Ashrafi case from 1995 acquisition). The State and some landowners challenged the High Court's award. The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in basing its award solely on the distant Ashrafi precedent while ignoring contemporary sale deeds on record. The Court distinguished Ashrafi as unsafe because the time gap exceeded the permissible five-year standard and the areas involved differed substantially. The judgment was set aside and remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration of all evidence.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Constitutional Law Evidence Valuation of Land Fair Market Value

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login