Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-11

M.C. Mehta vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — Madan B. Lokur

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that land notified under the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 in Haryana must be treated as forest land. The applicant (R. Kant & Co.) illegally constructed a film studio complex (Kant Enclave) on such notified land after August 1992 in violation of the Act and Court orders. The Court directed demolition of all structures built after 18th August 1992, ordered the applicant to deposit Rs. 5 crore for environmental rehabilitation under the Polluter Pays Principle, and mandated refunds with 18% interest to defrauded plot purchasers. Constructions made between April 1984 and August 1992 were allowed to remain as a reasonable compromise.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Environmental Law Forest Conservation Land Use Regulation Administrative Law Environmental Degradation Aravalli Hills Pollution Control Polluter Pays Principle Urban Development Water Resources

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login