Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-05-11 allowed

M.P. RAJYA TILHAN UTPADAK SAHAKARI SANGH MARYADIT, PACHAMA, DISTRICT SEHORE AND OTHERS vs M/S. MODI TRANSPORT SERVICE

Bench: 2 — Sanjiv Khanna, Bela M. Trivedi

In Brief

Modi Transport Service sued M.P. Rajya Tilhan Sangh for settlement of coal transport accounts under agreements dated 1990 and 1991. During proceedings, Modi Transport sought appointment of a Chartered Accountant (S.K. Mantri) to audit disputed accounts. The trial court appointed Mantri, who submitted a report favouring Modi Transport. The defendant challenged this as an invalid arbitration award. The High Court upheld it as a valid arbitration under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that Mantri was a commissioner, not an arbitrator, because there was no written agreement by both parties for arbitration. The Court distinguished arbitration (binding adjudication by consent) from expert determination (non-binding opinion to assist the court). The report was treated as a commissioner's report under the Civil Procedure Code, not an award.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Arbitration and Conciliation Act Expert Determination Commissioners Code of Civil Procedure Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution Consent and Agreement Court Adjudication

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login