Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-10-08 allowed

M/s Anvita Auto Tech Works Pvt. Ltd. M/s Aroush Motors & Anr vs M/s Aroush Motors & Anr

Bench: 2 — Aravind Kumar, N.V. Anjaria

In Brief

In a commercial dispute between an auto dealer and the manufacturer over non-performance of dealership obligations, the trial court rejected the defendant's Written Statement filed beyond the 120-day statutory period and barred cross-examination. The Supreme Court held that since the delay fell within the COVID-19 limitation suspension period (15.03.2020–28.02.2022), the defendant was entitled to file the Written Statement and exercise cross-examination rights. The Court reaffirmed that procedural rules must serve justice, not obstruct it, and that the right to cross-examine is fundamental to defence regardless of Written Statement filing. The judgment was set aside and the case remanded for fresh trial with cost of Rs. 1 lakh, to be completed within six months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Commercial Courts Act Civil Procedure Limitation COVID-19 Pandemic Written Statement Cross-examination Right of Defence Procedural Law Judicial Discretion

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login