Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-02-04 allowed

M/s Bombay Chemical Industries vs Deputy Labour Commissioner & Anr

Bench: 2 — M. R. Shah, B. V. Nagarathna

In Brief

A company challenged a Labour Court order directing it to pay wage arrears to a former employee. The Supreme Court held that a Labour Court under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act operates like an executing court, interpreting and enforcing existing awards or settlements. When an employer disputes the very existence of an employment relationship, the Labour Court cannot adjudicate that disputed fundamental issue. Such disputes must first be resolved through proper adjudication (e.g., under Section 10). Only after employment is established can wage differences be computed. The Court set aside the Labour Court's order and directed the employee to pursue appropriate proceedings to first establish his employment status.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Labour Law Industrial Disputes Act Jurisdiction Employment Law Wage Disputes

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login