Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-04-08 dismissed

M/S. CHATHA SERVICE STATION vs LALMATI DEVI & ORS

Bench: 2 — Sudhanshu Dhulia, K. Vinod Chandran

In Brief

In a motor accident involving an oil tanker that struck a cyclist and pedestrian, both fatally, the Supreme Court held that insurance companies can invoke the "pay and recover" principle when drivers lack the mandatory endorsement under Rule 9 of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. The Court rejected arguments that this requirement is merely technical, establishing that the specialized training—covering defensive driving, advanced skills, and product safety—is integral to driver competence for hazardous goods vehicles. Although the insurer must compensate claimants, it may recover from the vehicle owner. The Court dismissed the appellant's appeals, affirming that statutory compliance cannot be waived as a formality.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Vehicles Act Insurance Law Statutory Compliance Motor Accident Claims Hazardous Goods Transport

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login