Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-09-16 partly_allowed

M/s Steel Authority of India Limited vs Commissioner, Central Excise & Customs, Bhubaneswar

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari

In Brief

Steel Authority of India Limited sought Modvat credit on 'Guide Cars' used in its steel manufacturing, arguing they were components of the Coke Oven Battery. The central issue was whether a 'Guide Car'—equipment used to transport hot coke after processing—qualifies as a component entitled to duty credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Supreme Court held that a component must be an integral part necessary to the whole article's constitution. Since the Guide Car merely transports coke rather than being essential to the battery's function, it is a separate equipment and not a component. The Court upheld the denial of credit but quashed the penalty, finding the appellant acted in good faith.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Central Excise MODVAT Credit Capital Goods Tariff Classification Components

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login