Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-03-27 remanded

Mackintosh Burn Limited vs Sarkar and Chowdhury Enterprises Private Limited

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

Mackintosh Burn Limited, a government-owned company, sought to prevent registration of 100 shares purchased by Sarkar & Chowdhury Enterprises, fearing loss of control and breach of confidentiality due to their business rivalry. The Company Law Board directed registration. On appeal, the High Court dismissed the challenge on a technical ground (limitation), without addressing whether conflict of interest and mala fide intent constituted sufficient cause for refusal. The Supreme Court held that 'sufficient cause' for refusing share transfer is not limited to illegality but includes conflict of interest and mala fide intentions. The High Court erred in considering only the limitation question instead of all legal issues raised. The matter was remitted to the National Company Law Tribunal for fresh consideration of the substantive questions.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Corporate Law Company Law Share Transfer Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login