Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-18 allowed

Mahabir Industries vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

Mahabir Industries, which manufactures polythene in Himachal Pradesh, claimed income tax deduction under various sections of the Income Tax Act. After completing substantial expansion in 2006-07, it sought deduction under Section 80-IC for Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10. The Income Tax Department rejected the claim, and the High Court upheld the rejection, treating the ten-year deduction limit in Section 80-IC(6) as counting from the assessee's first deduction claim under Section 80-IA in 1998-99. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that Section 80-IC(6)'s ten-year ceiling applies only to North-Eastern Region industries claiming deduction under the second proviso to Section 80-IB(4). For Himachal Pradesh units like the assessee, the initial assessment year for the ten-year period commences from completion of substantial expansion, and earlier deduction periods are not counted.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Law Tax Deductions Industrial Undertakings Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login