Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-27 dismissed

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd vs Tata Communications Ltd

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

MTNL sought to recover amounts deducted from bills owed to Tata Communications for alleged failure to provide last-mile connectivity under a 2008 purchase order. Tata claimed the deductions were unlawful and exceeded contractual limits. The Court held that where an express contract exists, quantum meruit claims under Section 70 of the Contract Act cannot be pursued as an independent remedy, as that provision applies only to quasi-contractual situations with no underlying contract. The Court affirmed that liquidated damages are capped at 12% as stipulated in the contract, and amounts exceeding this ceiling must be refunded. Unilateral bill adjustments outside the contractual mechanism are impermissible.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contract Law Quantum Meruit Liquidated Damages Telecommunications Alternative Remedies Restitution

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login