Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-02-22 dismissed

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd vs State of U.P. and Ors

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna

In Brief

A finance company lent money to purchase a transport vehicle and repossessed it when the borrower defaulted. The question was whether the financier must pay vehicle tax under Uttar Pradesh's Motor Vehicles Taxation Act. The Court held that a financier in possession of a vehicle under a hire-purchase agreement qualifies as the 'owner' and must pay tax in advance before the vehicle can be used. Tax must be paid first, then the vehicle may be operated. The only exception is if documents are surrendered to tax authorities before the due date with proof of non-use. The financier can claim partial refund later if the vehicle remains unused, but only after paying tax upfront and meeting strict procedural requirements.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Vehicle Taxation Property Law Commercial Law Tax and Levies

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login