Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-06 allowed

Mangla Ram vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors

Bench: 2 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

Mangla Ram, a motorcycle rider, was severely injured in a road accident with a jeep on 10 February 1990, resulting in amputation of his right leg above the knee. He claimed compensation from the jeep owner, driver, and insurer. The Tribunal found the jeep involved but reduced compensation by half, citing Ram's contributory negligence. The High Court reversed, accepting the defendants' arguments. The Supreme Court restored the Tribunal's core findings on the jeep's involvement and driver negligence, holding the High Court had wrongly applied criminal law standards instead of the civil preponderance-of-probability test. The Court rejected the contributory negligence finding and enhanced compensation to Rs 2,77,792 plus 9% interest from the claim date.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Vehicles Act Motor Accident Claims Negligence - Tort Compensation Insurance Liability Preponderance of Probability Evidence Appellate Review Disability and Loss of Livelihood

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login