Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-16 dismissed

Mohammad Yusuf and Others Etc. Etc vs State of Haryana and Others

Bench: 2 — R.K. Agrawal

In Brief

Landowners in Haryana challenged the High Court's award of compensation of Rs. 64,80,000 per acre for land acquired for construction of a Mini Secretariat. They argued the High Court should have awarded higher compensation and should not have applied a 10% development deduction. The Supreme Court held that compensation must be calculated at the date of notification based on market value, comparable sales, and actual condition of the land. Although the land had basic amenities (water, electricity, sewer), it required further development to suit the acquisition purpose. The Court found the High Court's 10% deduction reasonable and proportionate, as it balanced landowners' rights against public purpose considerations. Appeals dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Property Rights Administrative Law Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login