Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-03-12 allowed

Mukesh Chand vs The State(NCT) of Delhi & Anr

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari

In Brief

An electricity consumer agreed to settle a theft of electricity dispute with BSES through the Lok Adalat, paying the agreed sum. He sought to quash the FIR filed by BSES against him under the Electricity Act. The High Court rejected his petition. The Supreme Court allowed his appeal, finding that the High Court failed to examine whether the offence could be compounded under Section 152 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Court remanded the case to the High Court to reconsider the petition with proper regard to the statutory compounding provisions.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Electricity Law Theft of Electricity Compounding of Offences Criminal Procedure Consumer Protection Settlement and Compromise

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login