Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-12-04 allowed

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr vs Pratibha Industries Ltd. & Ors

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai challenged a High Court Division Bench order that allowed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The issue centred on whether the High Court could recall its own order appointing an arbitrator when no valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties. The Supreme Court held that High Courts, as courts of record under Article 215 of the Constitution, possess inherent jurisdiction to recall their own orders to prevent miscarriage of justice. Finding no valid arbitration agreement in the contract (Clauses 13 and 22 were in-house dispute procedures, not arbitration clauses), the Court set aside the Division Bench judgment and allowed the appeal.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration High Court Powers Judicial Review Court of Record Tender Disputes

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login