Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-03-04 dismissed

N.C. Santhosh vs State of Karnataka & Ors

Bench: 3 — R. Banumathi, A. S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy

In Brief

Three government employees challenged cancellation of their compassionate appointments on the ground that they had applied and been appointed after the rules changed. The amended 1999 rules required minor dependents to apply within one year of the employee's death and attain age 18 by the application date—unlike the previous rule allowing application within one year of reaching majority. All three appellants attained majority years after their parent's death. The Court held that there is no vested right to compassionate appointment; eligibility is determined by rules in force when the application is considered, not when the employee died. The amended rules validly applied to their applications, rendering them ineligible. Cancellation was therefore justified.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Service Law Compassionate Appointment Administrative Law Constitutional Law Equality in Employment

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login