Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-25 partly_allowed

Naresh & Ors vs State of Uttarakhand & Ors

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

Four men were accused of attacking Tej Singh with an axe in 1998, causing injuries. The trial court acquitted all four. The High Court reversed this decision and convicted them. On appeal, the Supreme Court partly allowed the appeals: for three appellants, it upheld their conviction but eliminated jail time (already served) and increased the fine to Rs. 75,000 each, considering the 20-year case pendency, non-serious injuries, victim's survival without disability, and their first-offender status. The fourth appellant's conviction was set aside entirely due to insufficient proof of his involvement beyond reasonable doubt. He was acquitted and released.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Sentencing Appeal against Conviction Reversal of Acquittal Evidence and Proof

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login