Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-20 partly_allowed

Nehnu Ram @ Narendra vs State of Rajasthan & Anr

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The appellant was convicted of rape under Section 376 IPC for abducting and sexually assaulting a girl aged 15-16 years in 1989. The High Court upheld the conviction and 7-year sentence. The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, confirming that a minor cannot legally consent to sexual intercourse regardless of her apparent willingness. However, the Court invoked the proviso to Section 376(1) IPC to reduce the sentence to time already served (approximately 1 year 7 months), citing adequate and special reasons: the 30-year passage of time, absence of criminal antecedents, and settlement of both parties in life with their respective families.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Rape Sentencing Minor Indian Penal Code Proviso to Section 376

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login