Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-01-08 allowed

OM PRAKASH @ ISRAEL @ RAJU @ RAJU DAS vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR

Bench: 2 — M. M. Sundresh, Aravind Kumar

In Brief

An illiterate man convicted of murder at age 14 was sentenced to death despite repeatedly claiming juvenility throughout trial, appeal, and post-conviction proceedings. Courts relied on his bank account statement to assume adulthood, ignoring school birth certificates documenting he was 14 at the time of the crime. The Supreme Court held that the plea of juvenility can be raised at any stage, even after conviction and presidential clemency, and must be determined under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. Documentary evidence takes priority over circumstantial facts. The Court set aside the death sentence while maintaining conviction, emphasizing courts' constitutional duty to actively seek truth and ensure rehabilitation of juveniles in conflict with law.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Juvenile Justice Criminal Procedure Constitutional Law Age Determination Clemency and Pardon Parens Patriae Right to Rehabilitation Article 32 - Constitutional Remedies

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login