Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-13 dismissed

Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd vs Oswal Agro Mills Ltd

Bench: 2 — R.K. Agrawal

In Brief

An agent company (Oswal Agro Mills) was appointed to facilitate imports for a principal (Oswal Woollen Mills) under a REP licence scheme for a commission. A material value of Rs. 69.94 crores could not be imported due to the absence of required licences, constituting a breach of contract. The dispute was referred to arbitration. When two arbitrators disagreed, an Umpire was appointed. The appellant sought a de novo (complete fresh) hearing before the Umpire, but this was rejected as being made too late in the proceedings. The Umpire awarded Rs. 64.65 lakhs plus interest to the respondent. The Supreme Court held that while parties have a right to de novo hearings, this right can be waived by conduct, particularly by late applications at the end of proceedings. The Court dismissed the appeal, confirming that arbitrators' decisions on contract interpretation and damages are within their exclusive domain and not subject to court review unless manifestly erroneous.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940 Umpire jurisdiction De novo hearing Waiver by conduct Arbitration procedure Conciliation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login