In Brief
The petitioner sought to reschedule his failed Physical Efficiency Test (PET), claiming irregularities such as inadequate ground conditions and mixed-gender testing. However, the Court dismissed the petition, finding it was an afterthought. The petitioner had remained silent for over four months after failing the test on 12 September 2018, raising grievances only in January 2019 without explanation for the delay. The representation was filed just days before the petition without awaiting the authority's response, indicating the challenge lacked substance and was barred by the doctrine of laches."
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.