Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-03-02 partly_allowed

PAWAN KUMAR ARYA vs RAVI KUMAR ARYA

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan, M.R. Shah

In Brief

A family dispute concerning property division led to a consent settlement allocating 8 flats to the PA Group and 7 to the RA Group from a development project. When the RA Group refused to execute the allotment letter (Annexure E) without finalizing supplementary settlement terms, the PA Group sought execution. The Supreme Court held that while the supplementary consent terms must be executed by both parties within four months, the RA Group must counter-sign Annexure E within two weeks. The PA Group's flats remain subject to a restraint pending full implementation of the consent decree, preventing alienation until the settlement is completely executed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Execution of Decrees Consent Decrees Family Settlements Specific Performance

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login