Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-11-26 allowed

PERKINS EASTMAN ARCHITECTS DPC vs HSCC (INDIA) LIMITED

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Indu Malhotra

In Brief

Perkins Eastman Architects sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, after HSCC (India) Limited appointed an arbitrator contrary to the contract's dispute resolution clause. The Supreme Court held the arbitration was 'international commercial' because the lead consortium member was a foreign entity. The Court ruled that allowing an interested party to appoint a sole arbitrator violates independence and impartiality principles mandated by the 2015 Amendment Act, following TRF Limited v. Energo Engineering. Accordingly, the Court annulled HSCC's appointment and appointed Dr. Justice A.K. Sikri as the independent sole arbitrator for all three related disputes (Guntur, Kalyani, and Nagpur AIIMS projects).

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration International Commercial Arbitration Appointment of Arbitrators Independence and Impartiality Consortium Agreements Section 11(6) Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login