Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-15 allowed

Perry Kansagra vs Smriti Madan Kansagra

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

A child born to parents of different nationalities (one Indian, one Kenyan-British) became the subject of competing guardianship claims. The High Court of Delhi referred the dispute to mediation, where a counsellor interacted with the child and submitted a report. When the parents' dispute over the report's confidentiality reached the Supreme Court, the Court held that in child custody and guardianship matters, confidentiality rules for mediation do not apply to counsellor reports on the child's behaviour and wellbeing. The paramount consideration is the child's best interests, requiring the court to have access to expert evaluations. The Court also held that review jurisdiction was improperly exercised to overturn a defensible earlier judgment.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Family Law Child Custody and Guardianship Mediation and Conciliation Parens Patriae Jurisdiction Confidentiality in Mediation Alternative Dispute Resolution

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login