Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-03 allowed

Pimpri Chinchwad New Township Development Authority vs Vishnudev Co

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

The State acquired 40.49 hectares of land in Maharashtra for township development, and after compensation disputes, partially released 29.98 hectares in 1992. The retained 10.51 hectares were taken into possession in 2000, vesting in the State under Section 16 of the Land Acquisition Act. In 2004, the Revenue Minister informally noted approval for release of the remaining land, but this was never formally notified or communicated. The landowners sought mandamus. The Supreme Court held that once possession is taken under Section 16, Section 48 (allowing withdrawal from unoccupied acquisitions) ceases to apply. The Minister's mere filing notation, uncommunicated and never formally issued, was not a valid order. Release requires an official gazette notification. The High Court's mandamus was reversed, and the acquisition remained valid for the development project.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Public Law Administrative Law Constitutional Law Government Powers Compensation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login