Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-09 allowed

Popat & Kotecha Property & Ors vs Ashim Kumar Dey

Bench: 3 — Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

A landlord sought to evict a tenant for defaulting on payment of municipal taxes. The tenant argued that municipal taxes should be treated as rent and required a formal Rent Controller order for any increase. The Supreme Court held that Section 5(8) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 casts an independent statutory obligation on tenants to pay municipal tax. This obligation exists separately from rent and does not require a formal rent enhancement order. The landlord may apportion municipal taxes among multiple tenants based on area occupied. Therefore, the tenant's default on municipal tax constitutes a valid ground for eviction.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Tenancy Law Municipal Taxation Landlord and Tenant Eviction Statutory Interpretation West Bengal Property Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login