Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-08-25 allowed

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 vs KHYATI REALTORS PVT. LTD

Bench: 3 — Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia

In Brief

A company advanced ₹10 crores to a builder in 2007 for purchasing commercial property, which was never completed. The assessee sought to write off the amount as a bad debt deduction in 2009. The Revenue authority disallowed it, but the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and High Court allowed the assessee's claim. On appeal, the Supreme Court held that a bad debt can be written off as a deduction only if: (1) it is actually written off in accounts; (2) the amount was taken into account in computing prior income or was lent in ordinary business; and (3) it is a genuine debt, not a mere advance. Here, the assessee failed to prove the advance was made in the ordinary course of business and the amount was for capital property acquisition, not revenue expenditure. The Court reversed the lower courts' decisions and dismissed the deduction claim.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Bad Debts Business Expenditure Capital vs Revenue Statutory Interpretation Tax Deductions Accounting Standards

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login