Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-11 allowed

PSA Mumbai Investments Pte. Limited vs Board of Trustees of The Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust and Anr

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

A consortium led by PSA Mumbai (a Singapore company) submitted a bid for a container terminal project at Jawaharlal Nehru Port. The Port Authority issued a Letter of Award, which the consortium acknowledged. However, owing to changes in consortium composition and delays, the Letter of Award was later withdrawn. The Port Authority then invoked an arbitration clause in the draft Concession Agreement to claim damages. The Supreme Court held that the Letter of Award was not an absolute and unqualified acceptance constituting a binding contract. Multiple steps (SPV incorporation, performance guarantees, formal agreement signing) remained, and the bidding process itself explicitly disclaimed being an agreement. Therefore, no contract existed at the Letter of Award stage, and the arbitration clause did not apply to the bid-stage dispute. The appeal was allowed and the arbitrator's order (dismissing the arbitration) was reinstated.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration and Conciliation Contract Formation Tender/Bidding Process Public Procurement Arbitration Clause Applicability

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login