Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-05-12 allowed

PTC INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED vs VENKATESWARLU KARI AND ANOTHER

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

In Brief

This case concerns whether the registration of a pawnee as 'beneficial owner' of pledged dematerialized shares under the Depositories Act, 1996 and its regulations constitutes a 'sale' of those shares under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. A non-banking finance company (PIFSL) had pledged 31.8 crore shares as security for a loan. Upon default, it exercised its right to be registered as beneficial owner but did not sell the shares. The court held that registration is merely a procedural step enabling eventual sale, not a sale itself. The pledge remains unsatisfied, PIFSL retains its right to sell under the Contract Act, and the pawnor retains redemption rights. Consequently, the pawnee is a financial creditor (not a secured creditor based on the share value), and insolvency proceedings continue as the pledge was not discharged.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Pledge and Mortgage Dematerialized Securities Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Contract Law Depositories Act 1996 Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login