Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-02-24 allowed

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Bench: 2 — Vineet Saran, L. Nageswara Rao

In Brief

Punjab National Bank challenged confiscation orders passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise against Rathi Ispat Ltd., whose assets were mortgaged to the bank. The Supreme Court held that Rule 173Q(2) of Central Excise Rules 1944, which authorized confiscation of land, buildings, and machinery, stood omitted from 12 May 2000 onwards. The confiscation orders dated 26–29 March 2007 were therefore passed without statutory backing and are nullities. The Court found that subsequent rules (2001, 2002, 2017) did not restore this power and changed the vesting language from 'anything' to 'goods'. As a secured creditor under SARFAESI Act 2002, the bank has priority over unsecured Central Excise dues. Section 35 of SARFAESI gives it overriding effect. The appeal was allowed and confiscation orders quashed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Excise Law Central Excise Rules Confiscation Statutory Interpretation Secured Creditors SARFAESI Act Rule of Law Natural Justice Priority of Debts

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login