Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-09-10 allowed

R.P. GARG vs THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER,

Bench: 2 — Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Sandeep Mehta

In Brief

A contractor in a telecom infrastructure project claimed post-award interest on an arbitral award after the arbitrator initially denied it, citing a contract clause prohibiting interest. While the District Court granted 18% post-award interest, the High Court set this aside, holding the contract forbade it. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, post-award interest is a statutory right automatically due on arbitral awards and cannot be waived by contract. Only pre-award interest (under Section 31(7)(a)) is subject to party agreement. The Court distinguished the High Court's reliance on a prior judgment dealing with pendente-lite interest.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Statutory Interpretation Interest (Civil) Contract Law Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login