Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-03 disposed

Rachit Sinha & Ors vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — Not specified - 2 judges

In Brief

Petitioners who secured postgraduate medical seats in the first round of All India Quota counselling challenged changes made mid-cycle by the Medical Council of India's notice of 09.04.2018. The notice made previously ineligible candidates (who had not reported or resigned) eligible for the second round and allowed first-round allottees a two-day retention window post-second-round results. The Supreme Court dismissed the petitions, holding that regulatory changes aimed at preventing seat-blocking practices do not violate legal rights merely by reducing competition prospects. The Court vacated its interim order staying seat reversion and directed States to conduct fresh second-round counselling after receiving reverted unfilled All India Quota seats."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Medical Education Administrative Law Public Interest Litigation Regulatory Authority Admission Procedures Education Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login