Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-01-19 allowed

RAJA GOUNDER AND OTHERS vs M. SENGODAN AND OTHERS

Bench: 2 — M.M. Sundresh, S.V.N. Bhatti

In Brief

Muthusamy Gounder died intestate in 1982. His widow (Respondent No. 4) and two other women (Appellant No. 2 and Respondent No. 2, whose marriages to him were unproven) each had children. When a partition suit arose, the courts rejected the claims of the two unproven wives' children because the marriages were not legally established. The Supreme Court held that a registered mortgage deed, in which Muthusamy Gounder explicitly described the two women's children as his sons, constituted a binding admission under the Evidence Act. Despite the marriages' invalidity, the children qualified for equal shares in the notional partition of Muthusamy Gounder's estate as legitimated children of the deceased parent, in accordance with the Hindu Succession and Hindu Marriage Acts.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Hindu Succession Law Hindu Family Law Partition Evidence – Admissions Coparcenary Property Legitimate Children Joint Hindu Family Void and Voidable Marriages

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login