Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-05-06 allowed

RAJA SINGH vs STATE OF UP

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi, R. Subhash Reddy

In Brief

Four officers (Raja Singh, Makrand Prasad, Dharam Deo Tripathi, and Hem Raj Singh) were selected and appointed to the newly created post of District Minority Welfare Officer in Uttar Pradesh in 1997, prior to the enactment of the 2001 Service Rules governing that cadre. Their appointment letters stated the positions were temporary and for two years. The State later rejected their requests for absorption, arguing the 2001 Rules provided no mechanism for absorption of deputationists. The High Court dismissed their writ petition. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that appointments made by selection prior to the Rules coming into force constitute substantive appointments under the Rules' definition, not deputation. The officers are therefore entitled to absorption in the Minority Welfare Department.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Service Law Deputation and Transfer Absorption and Regularization Administrative Law Public Service Rules

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login