Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-03-15 partly_allowed

RAKESH RANJAN SHRIVASTAVA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR

Bench: 2 — Abhay S. Oka, Ujjal Bhuyan

In Brief

A bank cheque holder filed a criminal complaint alleging dishonor of a cheque for Rs. 2.2 crore issued as settlement of business disputes. The trial court ordered the accused to pay 10 lakh rupees (less than 5% of cheque amount) as interim compensation under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the trial concluded. The Supreme Court held that the power to award interim compensation is discretionary, not mandatory. The word "may" cannot mean "shall," as mandatory interpretation before guilt is established would violate fairness and Article 14. Courts must prima facie evaluate the case, consider the accused's defence, and record reasons. Factors like financial distress, transaction nature, and relationship between parties are relevant. The appeal was partly allowed and the case remitted to the trial court for reconsideration."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Negotiable Instruments Criminal Procedure Statutory Interpretation Cheque Dishonor Interim Compensation Discretionary Powers Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login