Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-23 allowed

S. Sukumar vs Secretary, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — Adarsh Kumar Goel

In Brief

Multi-disciplinary Accounting Firms (MAFs) operating in India through Indian partner firms were found to be systematically violating the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, FDI policy, and FEMA regulations through shared infrastructure, common brand names, and profit-sharing arrangements. The Supreme Court held that corporate personality cannot shield violation of statutory law. Even though partners are nominally Indian, when firms operate under foreign entity control with shared resources and remittances from abroad, this constitutes de facto violation of prohibitions on company practice and reciprocity principles. The Court directed constitution of a three-member expert committee to revisit regulatory oversight mechanisms, particularly for auditors, and ordered completion of pending investigations by the Enforcement Directorate and ICAI within three months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Chartered Accountants Act 1949 Professional Regulation Auditing Standards Foreign Direct Investment FEMA Compliance Corporate Veil Public Interest Professional Ethics Regulatory Oversight

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login