Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-26 allowed

Salmankhan Zalilkhan Pathan Throu Friend, Mohammed Rafik Hussainmiya Shaikh vs State of Gujarat

Bench: 1 — <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

A High Court quashed a preventive detention order passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985, finding that mere registration of offences under the Prohibition Act cannot establish a nexus with breach of public order. The Court distinguished between 'law and order' (ordinary criminal breaches) and 'public order' (disturbances affecting the community at large). It held that for detention to be justified, material must demonstrate the detenue is a menace to public order affecting society's tempo. Registration of FIRs alone, without evidence of threat to community peace, is insufficient. Ordinary penal laws adequately address such offences, and preventive detention cannot substitute for criminal prosecution.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Preventive Detention Public Order Criminal Procedure Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login