Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-01-04 partly_allowed

SANDOZ PRIVATE LIMITED vs UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari, Krishna Murari

In Brief

The Supreme Court resolved disputes over Terminal Excise Duty (TED) refunds involving Export Oriented Units (EOUs) and Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) suppliers under the Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014. The Court held that EOUs are entitled only to ab initio exemption from Central Excise Duty on goods procured from DTA suppliers and cannot claim TED refund independently. However, DTA suppliers are entitled to claim TED refund for goods supplied to EOUs as deemed exports under the FTP, subject to compliance with specified conditions. The refund modality depends on payment method: if paid via CENVAT credit, the refund is reversed to the credit account; if paid in cash, refund is made with 6% per annum simple interest. The refund authority must be the FTP-implementing agency, not excise authorities. The Court affirmed prior High Court decisions favoring suppliers and partly allowed the EOUs' appeals while partly allowing the Department's appeals.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Export Promotion Foreign Trade Policy Terminal Excise Duty Deemed Exports Export Oriented Units CENVAT Credit Refund of Duty Customs and Excise

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login