Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-17 dismissed

SCM Solifert Limited & Anr vs Competition Commission of India

Bench: 2 — Arun Mishra

In Brief

SCM Solifert acquired 24.46% of Mangalore Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited shares in a single transaction without prior notification to the Competition Commission, in alleged violation of section 6(2) of the Competition Act. A second acquisition followed without proper ex-ante notification. The Supreme Court held that section 6(2) mandates notification before (not after) entering into a combination. The acquisition of over 10% shares constitutes a combination requiring prior notification. Placing shares in escrow does not prevent consummation. Mens rea is not required for civil penalty under section 43A; penalty is mandatory upon proof of breach. The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the Rs. 2 crores penalty.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Competition Law Combinations and Mergers Regulatory Compliance Penalty and Enforcement Securities Regulation Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login