Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-08 partly_allowed

Shamanna and Another vs Divisional Manager The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

When a motor vehicle accident victim or their family seeks compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, the court can order the insurance company to pay the third-party claimants and recover the amount from the vehicle owner, provided the driver lacked a valid driving licence or policy conditions were breached. The High Court wrongly set aside this 'pay and recover' direction based on Article 142 limitations. The Court upheld the Tribunal's order and enhanced the compensation from Rs. 3,55,500 to Rs. 4,94,700, with the insurance company to pay the claimants and recover from the owner under statutory procedures, thereby protecting accident victims while preserving insurers' contractual remedies against insured vehicle owners."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Vehicle Insurance Third-Party Risks Statutory Liability Doctrine of Pay and Recover Insurance Law Accident Compensation Motor Vehicles Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login