Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-01-09 allowed

SHILPA MITTAL vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

Bench: 2 — Deepak Gupta, Aniruddha Bose

In Brief

A juvenile (aged 16-18) was alleged to have caused death by culpable homicide under Section 304 IPC, punishable with life imprisonment or up to 10 years (no minimum sentence prescribed). A Juvenile Justice Board held he committed a 'heinous offence' and should be tried as an adult. The High Court disagreed, finding that since the offence carried no minimum 7-year sentence, it was not 'heinous' under Section 2(33) of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. The Supreme Court upheld this view, holding that 'heinous offence' requires a minimum sentence of 7 years or more—the word 'minimum' cannot be removed. The Court recognised a legislative gap (4th category of offences) and directed such offences be treated like 'serious offences' pending Parliament's action. The Court also directed removal of the child's name from the High Court judgment per Section 74 protections.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Juvenile Justice Criminal Law Statutory Interpretation Constitutional Law Child Rights Heinous Offences

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login