Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-13 dismissed

Shriram EPC Limited vs Rioglass Solar SA

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

An ICC arbitral award delivered in London favoured Rioglass Solar SA against Shriram EPC Limited. Shriram challenged the award's enforceability in India, arguing that an unstamped foreign award cannot be enforced under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Supreme Court held that the term 'award' in Schedule I of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 has never included foreign awards since its enactment. Although foreign awards existed in 1899, the legislature deliberately created separate legislative frameworks to govern them without expanding the original definition. Consequently, foreign awards are not liable to stamp duty under Indian law and cannot be rendered unenforceable by lack of stamping. The appeal was dismissed and the Single Judge's order enforcing the foreign award was upheld.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Foreign Awards Stamp Duty Enforcement International Commercial Arbitration New York Convention

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login