Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-09-25 allowed

Singamasetty Bhagavath Guptha & Anr vs Allam Karibasappa (D) by LRS. / Allam Doddabasappa (D) by LRS. & Ors

Bench: 2 — Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Atul S. Chandurkar

In Brief

This case examined whether a sale of an insolvent's property by the Official Receiver remains protected under Section 37 of the Provincial Insolvency Act after annulment of insolvency, despite the underlying transaction being based on fabricated documents. An appellant inherited a partnership share; he was declared insolvent and the Receiver sold the share to another party in 1983. When the insolvency was later annulled in 1996, the trial court found the documents proving the pre-insolvency contract were forged and cancelled the sale deed. The High Court reversed this, relying on Section 37. The Supreme Court restored the trial court's order, holding that Section 37 protection applies only to sales that are 'duly made'—meaning based on valid, bona fide, and final orders. Since the order authorizing the sale was set aside and the transaction was fraudulent, Section 37 did not apply.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency Law Appellate Procedure Evidence - Documentary Property Rights Fraud and Forgery

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login