Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-11-14 partly_allowed

British Airways PLC vs C.I.T., Delhi

Bench: 2 — Surya Kant, M.M. Sundresh

In Brief

Airlines must deduct tax at source (TDS) under Section 194H on "Supplementary Commission" earned by travel agents—amounts charged above the airline's set fare. The Supreme Court held that the airline-travel agent relationship is a single principal-agent arrangement under the Contract Act, covering both ticket supply and customer sales. Discretion in pricing does not break this relationship. Although travel agents have already paid tax on these amounts (making recovery revenue-neutral), airlines remain liable for interest on the deduction delay. Penalties are waived as the legal issue was genuinely disputed when the default occurred. The Court partly allowed airlines' appeals, quashing demand recovery and penalties while directing interest calculation."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) Section 194H Principal-Agent Relationship Contract Law Airline Industry Commission and Brokerage Assessment Orders Penalties and Interest

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login