Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-14 allowed

State Bank of India vs V. Ramakrishnan & Anr

Bench: 2 — R. F. Nariman

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, applies only to corporate debtors and does not extend to personal guarantors. Although a corporate debtor is undergoing insolvency proceedings, creditors can continue proceedings against personal guarantors under laws like SARFAESI. The Court rejected the NCLAT's broad interpretation that the moratorium protects guarantors, noting that Section 14 makes no mention of guarantors, unlike other provisions of the Code. The Court also held that a 2018 amendment clarifying this position has retrospective effect and governs the case. The appeals by the State Bank of India were allowed, reversing the appellate tribunal's decision that had restrained the bank from acting against the personal guarantor.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Moratorium Personal Guarantees Statutory Interpretation Legislative Intent

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login