Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-14 allowed

State Bank of India vs V. Ramakrishnan & Anr

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which provides for a moratorium upon admission of a corporate insolvency petition, does not apply to personal guarantors of the corporate debtor. A plain reading of Section 14 refers only to the corporate debtor and is silent on guarantors. The legislative history shows Parliament deliberately omitted guarantor protections that existed in earlier insolvency laws, indicating intent that guarantors should not be shielded. The Court also noted that a 2018 amendment explicitly excluding sureties from moratorium protection, being clarificatory in nature, has retrospective effect and confirms the original intent. Creditors may therefore continue recovery proceedings against personal guarantors under SARFAESI Act even during the corporate debtor's insolvency resolution.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency Law Corporate Insolvency Moratorium Personal Guarantor Statutory Interpretation Contract of Guarantee

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login