Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-18 allowed

State by Lokayuktha Police vs H. Srinivas

Bench: 2 — N.V. Ramana

In Brief

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decision quashing FIRs against public servants for corruption, holding that absence of General Diary entries during preliminary enquiry does not render the prosecution illegal. While Lalitha Kumari directs that preliminary enquiries must be recorded in the General Diary, the Court clarified that this is an obligation of best efforts, not a mandatory precondition for FIR registration. The distinction between irregularity and illegality is material under criminal procedure; failure to maintain diary entries is an irregularity affecting the course of investigation, not a grave defect vitiating the entire proceeding. Preliminary enquiry in corruption cases serves as an important safeguard against false prosecutions. The trial court, not a writ court, is equipped to assess the effect of such procedural lapses on the merits.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Prevention of Corruption Police Investigation Preliminary Enquiry FIR Registration Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login