Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-09-01 allowed

State of Telangana & Ors. Etc vs Kalluri Naga Narasimha Abhiram & Ors. Etc

Bench: 2 — B. R. Gavai, K. Vinod Chandran

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld Telangana's rule requiring candidates to have studied or resided in the State for four consecutive years to be eligible for domicile quota seats in medical colleges. The Court set aside a High Court order that had read down this requirement for permanent residents. The judgment affirmed that the State Legislature's definition of 'local candidate' is constitutionally valid, properly grounded in Article 371D and a Presidential Order, and is not arbitrary or exclusionary. However, the Court added a proviso exempting children of government employees, All-India Services officers, defence/paramilitary personnel, and public sector undertaking employees posted outside Telangana during relevant study years, upon production of employment certificates.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Educational Law Constitutional Law Medical Education Domicile/Reservation Policy Article 371D Administrative Law Judicial Review

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login