Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-03-26 partly_allowed

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH vs JAIL SUPERINTENDENT (ROPAR) & Ors

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy

In Brief

A sitting MLA from Uttar Pradesh, facing multiple serious criminal trials before a Special Court for MPs/MLAs, was taken into custody from District Jail Banda in connection with an extortion case registered in Punjab. The Judicial Magistrate in Punjab sent him to Rupnagar Jail instead of returning him, where he remained for over two years. Uttar Pradesh sought his transfer back, but the Punjab jail repeatedly denied custody citing minor health ailments like diabetes and hypertension. The Supreme Court held the State maintainable as a "party interested" under Section 406 of the Criminal Procedure Code. While refusing to transfer the investigation (at preliminary stage), it invoked Article 142 to order the prisoner's transfer to Uttar Pradesh within two weeks, ensuring proper medical care, as the trivial health grounds were obstructing serious trials and the rule of law.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Criminal Procedure Transfer of Cases Maintenance of Writ Petitions Article 142 Powers Undertrial Prisoner Transfer Fair Trial Prosecuting Agency Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login